On March
24, 2015 a Germanwings airbus carrying 150 people, crashed en route from
Barcelona to Dusseldorf. The plane shattered in a remote area of the French
Alps. No one survived. Read more about the tragedy here.
Such a
crisis fundamentally disrupts an organization’s daily work and asks for
adequate reaction in order to minimize reputational threat and
societal harm. How did Germanwings handle their crisis?How would
academic public relations researchers evaluate Germanwings responses? Find out
bellow!
FIRST PHASE
Through reconstruction of the black box, today we know that the plane crashed at 10.40am. The first corporate messages Germanwings published were the following tweets:INFO: We have recently become aware of media reports speculating on an incident though we still do not have any own confirmed information...— Eurowings (@eurowings) 24. März 2015
... As soon as definite information is available, we shall inform the media immediately ...— Eurowings (@eurowings) 24. März 2015
... Please monitor our website http://t.co/5mVrxAZ08K for periodic updates.— Eurowings (@eurowings) 24. März 2015
Germanwings
first reaction to the crisis event was in line with academics’ recommendations.
They responded promptly to speculations and they did so on Twitter. Study shows
that facing a crisis event people first consult people based media such as
Twitter to get information about the issue. Further, Germanwings accepted the
uncertainty they were dealing with. According to academics,
admitting to the uncertainty and ambiguity is superior to giving information
that needs to be revised at a later point due to new information. Revision may
decrease credibility and trust.
SECOND PHASE
The second
phase was less praiseworthy. After the first three tweets Germanwings got mute.
Redirecting people to the corporate website for information updates (see third tweet) lead the website to go
down. In addition, while other news media constantly published updates about the crash, Germanwings second
response was published more than 90 minutes after the crash and it was only a retweeted statement
by their parent company Lufthansa. This proceeding is highly suboptimal. During
an acute crisis situation it is crucial to remain accessible and meet the needs of the media. Further, academics strongly advise to communicate
with honesty and openness. So even a short tweet saying “Our crisis team is currently talking to
French authorities” would have been recommended.
THIRD PHASE
While confirmation about the crash already spread all over the news media, Germanwings did not improve their communication during the third
phase. Way after gaining the sad certainty that the plane crashed, Germanwings
tweeted the following statement:
UPDATE: Wir müssen leider bestätigen, dass Flug 4U9525 auf dem Flug von BCN nach DUS über den französischen Alpen verunglückt ist ...— Eurowings (@eurowings) 24. März 2015
Unfortunately
they published the statement only in German and it took them 3.5 hours to tweet
the same statement in
English while other news media already reported that the co-pilot crashed the
plane intentionally. In this short statement they missed to express emotions such as empathy and regret. Such
emotions have been proven to diminish reputational risk. Lufthansa’s
tweets serve as a good example how to demonstrate such emotions. Read them here and here.
CONCLUSION
In
summary, Germanwings handled their acute crisis communication poorly. Most
importantly, they failed to update their news channels in a timely manner and
missed out on expressing emotions arising from this tragedy. This short
analysis makes it seem as if Germanwings did not have an elaborated crisis plan at hand, which is surprising regarding size and sector of the company.
This
evaluation is based on the initial responses evoked by the crisis event and
does not include the crisis management of the days following the crash. Do you
have any thoughts or interesting examples about how Germanwings handled the
crisis during the days following the catastrophic event? Let us know and
comment below.
Vera Spring is a corporate communication graduate student at the University of Amsterdam with a background in banking and psychology. She has a keen interest in public relations practice and the endless possibilities the avenue of social media has to offer.
ABOUT THIS AUTHOR
VERA SPRING
Vera Spring is a corporate communication graduate student at the University of Amsterdam with a background in banking and psychology. She has a keen interest in public relations practice and the endless possibilities the avenue of social media has to offer.
No comments:
Post a Comment